{"id":35131,"date":"2026-07-09T10:18:52","date_gmt":"2026-07-09T08:18:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalmondo.com\/?p=35131"},"modified":"2026-07-09T10:18:52","modified_gmt":"2026-07-09T08:18:52","slug":"cartels-compliance-data-privacy-new-brazil-risk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalmondo.com\/es\/2026\/07\/cartels-compliance-data-privacy-new-brazil-risk\/","title":{"rendered":"Cartels, Compliance, and Data Privacy: The New \u00abBrazil Risk\u00bb"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For many investors and law firms, the \u201cBrazil risk\u201d in the context of compliance is still largely viewed through the lens of labor issues, environmental matters, and state corruption. However, the actual scenario is much more complex and silent. Recently, US authorities have moved to classify the First Capital Command (PCC) and the Red Command (CV) as terrorist organizations, as they have been considered the largest criminal organizations in the West.<\/p>\n<p>What often escapes the international radar is that these groups no longer operate exclusively on the margins of society. Recent police operations in the financial heart of S\u00e3o Paulo, Faria Lima, have revealed sophisticated schemes in which the illicit capital of these organizations is laundered through highly complex corporate structures, infiltrating the formal economy through fintechs, investment funds, cryptocurrency brokers, agribusiness, and logistics companies.<\/p>\n<p>For foreign companies operating or seeking business partners in Brazil, the risk landscape has changed: <strong>the threat<\/strong> is no longer just an improper payment to a tax inspector, but <strong>the accidental (and disastrous) association with a transnational criminal organization <\/strong>operating under the guise of a legitimate supplier.<\/p>\n<p>This new Brazilian paradigm directly collides with the growing regulatory pressure against money laundering. For example, with the advancement of the European Anti-Money Laundering Directives (AMLD) and the upcoming Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), European parent companies are increasingly held accountable for their entire value chain. The requirement for enhanced due diligence, driven by the moves of the US Department of Justice, only increases the need for a new approach when doing business in Brazil.<\/p>\n<p>Operating in Brazil today requires <strong>rigorous Know Your Partner (KYP) procedures<\/strong> and in-depth background checks. It is not enough to verify whether the partner company has clearance certificates; it is necessary to identify the <strong>Ultimate Beneficial Owners (UBOs)<\/strong> and <strong>investigate the true origin of the funds<\/strong>, as well as the political and commercial connections of local directors.<\/p>\n<p>It is at this point that subsidiaries and business partners, especially European ones concerned with personal data protection, face a seemingly unsolvable conflict. To avoid links with organized crime infiltrated in the formal economy, compliance departments need to collect <strong>large volumes of data,<\/strong> <strong>cross-reference information from open-source intelligence (OSINT), and manage robust whistleblowing channels.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>However, these investigative actions clash directly with the principles of the <strong>Brazilian General Data Protection Law (LGPD),<\/strong> which is largely inspired by the European GDPR:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>How can one deeply investigate the criminal history, associations, and integrity of an executive or supplier without violating the principle of data minimisation?<\/li>\n<li>How can sensitive data (such as criminal records) be processed lawfully when the law itself imposes rigid barriers on this type of processing?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The <strong>great challenge of modern legal practice<\/strong> is structuring investigations and due diligences that are ruthless against organized crime but surgical in data protection. In practice, this requires a <strong>highly<\/strong> <strong>customized governance design<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Precise Legal Basis:<\/strong> The indiscriminate use of consent for background checks is flawed, as it can be revoked. It is necessary to calibrate the use of legal bases such as \u00abLegitimate Interest\u00bb (when applicable and after a rigorous proportionality test) or the \u00abRegular Exercise of Rights\u00bb and compliance with \u00abLegal\/Regulatory Obligations.\u00bb<\/li>\n<li><strong>Secure Whistleblowing Channels:<\/strong> The flow of information from whistleblowers must guarantee the anonymity of those reporting complex schemes, while simultaneously protecting the personal data of the investigated parties until the materiality of the facts is confirmed, preventing leaks and moral damages.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Purpose Mapping:<\/strong> The cross-referencing of supplier data in Faria Lima cannot become a fishing expedition. The collection must be strictly limited to the data necessary to mitigate the risks of money laundering and fraud.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Data protection and the prevention of organized crime are not opposing forces; they are complementary pillars of the same governance structure. For foreign investors, turning a blind eye to the sophistication of Brazilian criminal organizations is not an option, but ignoring privacy rules during an investigation also generates potential liabilities in the millions.<\/p>\n<p>Today&#8217;s market demands a hybrid approach in which compliance serves as a shield against transnational threats, and data protection ensures that this shield operates in accordance with the highest ethical and legal standards of the global market.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For many investors and law firms, the \u201cBrazil risk\u201d in the context of compliance is still largely viewed through the lens of labor issues, environmental matters, and state corruption. However, the actual scenario is much more complex and silent. Recently, US authorities have moved to classify the First Capital Command (PCC) and the Red Command [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":754,"featured_media":35140,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2223,1379],"tags":[1712],"class_list":["post-35131","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-compliance","category-privacy-data-protection","tag-brazil"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalmondo.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalmondo.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalmondo.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalmondo.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/754"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalmondo.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35131"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalmondo.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35131\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35148,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalmondo.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35131\/revisions\/35148"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalmondo.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35140"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalmondo.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35131"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalmondo.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35131"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalmondo.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}